2000.11.29
Oh, I love this time of year! It's the start of the college basketball season!
Houston Chronicle: LSU nips Houston 61-59.
Bright sinks winning bucket with less than a second to play.
"LSU, whose non-conference schedule is generally loaded with home games and
tournament contests, earned its first non-conference win
on an opponent's home floor since a victory at Maryland on Jan. 2, 1989."
2000.11.20
I haven't posted any new family pictures in a couple of months, so I'm
going to try to post a new batch before Thanksgiving. For now, here's
a picture from August of Christopher at Texas Children's Hospital,
checking in for minor surgery.
New York Times: The Next
Stage in Supercomputing.
"... the widely publicized, semiannual list of
the world's most powerful supercomputers is
misleading at best. Companies that do well in the
listing use it for bragging rights - most recently,
I.B.M.'s presence in the ranking has been soaring -
but users and vendors alike agree that it is based on
tests that have almost nothing to do with how useful
the computers are.
"Users are trying to come up with more realistic
bench marks to help explain to Congress and other
sources of financing why expensive computers that
look slower on paper might be better buys. To
underscore their concerns, they note that the record
for sustained performance on a real application was
set two years ago by a Cray computer running at
little more than a fifth the speed rating of the I.B.M.
computer that currently tops the raw speed
rankings."
eWeek: Ding,
dong, the witch is dead (almost)!
"With its next Windows client, code-named Whistler, Microsoft at last
moves to end the tyranny of mediocrity with which
Windows 95, Windows 98 and now Millennium Edition have reigned."
Physics Today: Supersymmetry:
Squarks, Photinos, and the Unveiling of the Ultimate Laws of Nature.
"... our models of nature can be expected to be
valid only within a limited domain of energies, because
our basic framework--relativistic quantum field
theory--gives answers that are insensitive to physics at
energies much higher than those we are studying.... Thus,
biologists need know nothing about atomic nuclei,
chemists and atomic physicists need know nothing about
quarks, and so on. This notion is one of the greatest
advances of 20th century physics. It puts us ahead of the
19th century giants who thought physics was complete."
2000.11.18
Houston Chronicle: For elder Bush,
pride in his son beats politics.
"Bush had been hunting in Spain with former Indiana University basketball
coach Bobby Knight, among others, partly to get away from the attention and the
fallout from the election.
"`This is on everybody's mind, all around the world,' he said.
`But I have just stayed out of it. One reason I was glad to
be in Spain with calm figures like Bobby Knight shooting
red-leg partridge was because I wanted to calm down and not be in the cross
fire...'"
From the archives:
ESPN: Bob Knight career timeline.
"1999: Knight accidentally shoots hunting partner in the back and is cited for
failing to report the incident and hunting without a license in Wisconsin."
2000.11.14
Physics Today: Chandra
X-Ray Observatory Examines a New Kind of Black Hole.
"For decades, astronomers have been accumulating
increasingly strong evidence for the existence of black holes
in two distinct mass regimes: `stellar' black holes, weighing
a few times the mass of the Sun (Msun), and `supermassive'
black holes with masses ranging from 10^6 - 10^9 Msun, always
sitting at the centers of galaxies. There seemed to be nothing
in between.
"But last year, two groups of x-ray astronomers
presented tentative suggestions of something quite new: a
middleweight class of black holes much more massive than
the stellar black holes but distinctly lighter than the
supermassive giants."
2000.11.11
I've noticed comments all over the web in the last week -- by Gore supporters --
proclaiming that the electoral college is an anachronism that should be replaced
by a direct popular vote.
WRONG!
If you think the current situation in Florida is a mess, imagine if we needed a
recount of the entire country. That would be a possibility if the president
was chosen by a direct popular vote. Talk about a constitutional crisis!
For a more complete defense of the electoral college, read this [pointer via Slate].
And be sure to read this
history of the 1888 election. Although often cited as a breakdown of the
electoral process, it was actually the e.c.'s finest hour.
CNN: Bush
goes to court to halt hand ballot recounts in Florida.
"The Gore campaign, which was criticized Friday by the Bush camp
for considering its own legal options, stressed Saturday that it is
now the Bush campaign that is going to court. "
Well, so much for Bush taking the high road. My wife told me yesterday I was being
too kind to him. (My wife hasn't been very kind to Dubya. For the last day, she's
been making fun of his big zit.)
I think this is obvious to most people around the nation, but for the record:
Florida needs to make the most accurate count possible of valid presidential
ballots, including absentee ballots. It doesn't matter if it takes one or two or
three weeks. The electoral college doesn't meet for another five weeks anyway, and
the process isn't over until the e.c. votes.
To suggest that it is more important to crown a victor quickly than to count all
the votes is ludicrous. Nowhere in the constitution does it say that the television
networks have to declare a winner the night of the election. In fact, the electoral
process was deliberately designed with a six weeks delay between the popular vote
and the electoral college to avoid a constitutional crisis in a situation like this.
[After I posted this, the CNN page I'm pointing to was updated with the following
tibit:
"Bob Crawford, who replaced Gov. Jeb Bush as commissioner of
Florida's Canvassing Commission, said Saturday that if a county
misses the state's deadline for certifying results, the entire county's
vote will be thrown out.
"`The statute is very clear that if a county's results are not to us by 5
p.m. Tuesday we shall ignore that county's vote, and the counties
need to be very aware of that,' Crawford told reporters. `Candidates
asking for recounts need to be aware of that.'"]
2000.11.10
CNN: Bush
moves forward with `responsible' administration planning sessions.
"Speaking for a few short minutes with reporters at the
opening of an afternoon planning session in Austin,
the Texas state capital, Bush said: `I understand there are
still votes to be counted, but I am in the process of
planning in a responsible way a new administration....[S]hould the
verdict that has been announced be confirmed, we'll be ready
to assume office and be prepared to lead.'"
O.K., although I am a Gore supporter, I must admit that this is the
perfect response and exactly what I've been hoping to hear from the
Bush camp. A modest acknowledgement that all the votes must be
counted before a victor is crowned.
Of course, it would be more perfect if Bush wasn't so damned insistent on
immodestly referring to himself as a responsible leader.
Now it's time for Gore to call off Warren Christopher and his hoard of
lawyers. Take a deep breath, Al, and face the facts:
Assuming Bush's lead holds in Florida, he will take the Presidency in
January, even having lost the popular vote. And he will have won Florida
by the slimist margin imaginable. A margin that would certainly have been
reversed if thousands of voters hadn't lost their votes due to balloting
errors.
It's a shame, particularly if you are a Gore supporter. But those are the
rules of the game. We all have to abide by them.
2000.11.04
On Friday afternoon I attended a talk at UH by Nobel laureate Steven Weinberg.
It was run-of-the-mill stuff, but my expectations weren't high; the title was
"The Limits of Knowledge." The questions from the audience following the talk
were really disappointing. Bogus philosophy stuff.
[Aside: most of the classic philosophy questions that college freshmen think are
"really deep" really aren't. These are the "meaning of life" questions. In the
end, these questions are usually just examples of language abuse -- putting a
group of unrelated words and concepts together into questions that sound logical,
but are fundamentally meaningless. This is also true of most "really deep"
physics questions.]
I had a physics question I wanted to ask about ... well, maybe I'll write about it
later. In any case, during the reception after the talk, I spent 15 minutes
working my way over to Weinberg, with the intention of asking my question. But
just as I was about to introduce myself, he took off his glasses and started
groping his way toward a seat, complaining that he needed to sit down. And he
really looked like he needed a seat; watching him, I was worried that he might be
about to faint. So I discarded my physics inquiry, and instead I asked, "Do you
need something to drink?"
He answered no. A few minutes later he left.
Another bush with greatness.
The latest presidential polls are out. They show that Bush is up point one zero percent.
har, har, har.